Category Archives: Left

Greens Adam Bandt threatens revolution

The ABC interviewed Greens MP Adam Bandt about a Greens colleague who called Liberal Party senators ‘arsonists’ while firefighters struggled with bushfires raging along the east coast of Australia. This was the usual overheated rhetoric of the Greens who alleged the bushfires are caused by ‘climate change’. The abuse provoked anger and disgust across the community – for obvious reasons.

Interviewer Fran Kelly asked Bandt if he thought it a little insensitive – a rather silly question because the lunatic Greens are remorseless about furthering their Marxist agenda. They are like ice blocks when it comes to offending anyone deviating from their far-left agenda. Bandt replied that people should listen to ‘a generation that’s terrified and aghast with what they’re seeing with the climate crisis.’ Then he added this;

“Unless the Government gets the climate crisis under control and reins in its use of coal, then this generation is going to rise up with a fury that is matched only by the intensity of the fires.’

Well, Adam Bandt, you and your far-left madmen have over fifty years destroyed everything good about Australia. Has it ever occurred to you that there is a deep-seated anger among millions of ordinary Australians that just might explode before your legions of indoctrinated children rise up – as you incite them to do.

You should be careful of what you wish for. You might get a revolution, but not one you want.

Activists burrowing into the corporate world

Peta Credlin on Sky News interviews Janet Albrechtsen of the Australian.

Activists using companies ‘as Trojan horses to push social agendas’

15/11/2019|10min

Janet Albrechtsen has called out a major issue facing corporate Australia with activists “using companies as Trojan horses to push their social agendas”.

Ms Albrechtsen revealed in The Australian on Friday a push to remove Harvey Norman CEO Katie Page from the board of the company and have her replaced by shareholder activist Stephen Mayne.

Corporate advisory group Ownership Matters has advised its clients to vote against the re-election of Ms Page and instead support Mr Mayne, who has no corporate experience in retail or property.

Ms Albrechtsen said such a move is “not in the interests of shareholders” and “not in the interests of innovation”. “Companies should have enough latitude to try out different models of corporate governance to see what works,” she said.

Ms Albrechtsen said the “silver lining” of this “dreadful saga” is that it has “completely blown the diversity agenda out of the water”. “If diversity now means getting rid of the most experienced person on the board, and in her place putting a man who has zero experience to be on the board of Harvey Norman … diversity has now lost any kind of credibility.”

item

What to do about the fanatical left?

One has to admire the ingenuity and perseverance of the left. Over fifty years there has been no slackening in their Marxist agenda. In 2019 we see the major organs and institutions of our once liberal-democratic society captive of the left: the universities, the schools, the public service, the media, sports administration and even the corporate world. The stunning gains in the last few years have been sports administration and the corporate world.

The capture of the corporate world is no better exemplified than in Alan Joyce CEO of Qantas. Homosexual Alan Joyce came to Australia with his boyfriend to head up Qantas, an iconic Australian company and the pride of Australians. Without any compunction whatsoever, he used Qantas as a tool to further his far-left ideals. He is quiet open and unabashed about his deviousness and the insult to Australians.

One could weep over the developments in sports administration. Alan Joyce types, those undaunted by their betrayal, now head the administrations of Australian Rules, Rugby Union and Rugby League. If a sportsman does not toe the leftist line in these sports, there is no future for him.

The outstanding and outrageous example is Israel Folau. This champion footballer in both League and Union has no sporting future because he won’t be bowed by the traitors who have insinuated themselves into these once great sports, sporting codes that every boy could once aspire to.

But there has been a new development that has tightened the grip of the far left on our decaying traditional society. They have now formed pressure groups to stop those few conservatives defending traditional morality and traditional western society. No tactic, no matter how nasty and grubby, is beneath them. Their tool is BLACKMAIL.

The far left are now seriously threatening Alan Jones of Radio 2GB and Andrew Bolt of Sky News. By threatening bad publicity they are picking off the advertisers who make such programs possible . And it’s working. Alan Jones and Andrew Bolt are losing advertising. What a gutless display by these companies. Their cowardice makes you vomit. What happened to the principled manly Australian who once would have held up his fists to such traitorous blackmail?

It’s total war for the left. The leftist war won’t end until there’s total victory and Orwell’s 1984 becomes a reality. We are a long way down the path.

I ask, what to do about the fanatical left?

Summary of the Pell Papers

Chris S Friel working from the other side of the world has done outstanding work on the Cardinal Pell Affair. He has produced a series of sharp compelling analyses of all the important features of Cardinal’s conviction for the sexual abuse of a minor. Friel’s work will be in the frontline of any research serious investigators undertake in scrutinising of one of the most shocking sets of circumstances in Australia’s history.

On the eve of The High Court of Australia’s decision about allowing an appeal, Friel has posted an extremely useful summary of the work he has done. One can access it on the Academia website. I have reproduced it on my primary website.

This is ‘your ABC’

The latest Q&A program on ‘our’ ABC was a long delusional rant by a group of hysterical feminists who reduced the world to a cruel white patriarchy in which all women were the victims. So the viewer was exposed to a frenzy of anti-white anti-male bigotry and weeping crying helpless victimology.

The leading ranter was a self-styled ‘Egyptian-American’ woman who could barely stop herself from calling for the wholesale slaughter of men, as she did on another occasion (see previous blog). This is indeed ‘your ABC’ as the current ABC promotion goes.

Yes, it is the ABC, Australia’s fortress of Marxist traitors who are pursuing their campaign of perverting everything that was good about Australia with its largely Anglo population. A key part of that campaign is to disappear the Anglos and replace them with a more appropriate brand of person, presumably ‘people of colour’ like the deluded Egyptian-American.

POSTSCRIPT

ABC TV pulled the program from their platform after a storm of understandable criticism. The Egyptian-American unbowed and unperturbed continued her delusional rant on other social media platforms. news.com.au provided the relevant clip of the disturbed fantasist in action

Christina Hoff Sommers’ short comment on this feminist type.

‘A PUSHBACK AGAINST VISCERAL UNREASON’

TONY ABBOTT AND THE TIMES OF REVOLUTION

Reviewed by Michael Gilchrist – News Weekly, 19 October 2019

Available through Amazon and Smashwords

After years of inaccurate and negative treatment of Tony Abbotts political career and image, both by the media and in assorted writings, a positive corrective is long overdue.

Many Australians accept as fact the crude caricatures and inaccuracies regarding Abbott: that he is a “wrecker”, a religious fanatic, a bully, anti-women, a far-right knuckle-dragger.

Gerard Wilson’s latest book, Tony Abbott and the Times of Revolution, will be welcomed by those who, despite all the media misinformation, continue to admire the former prime minister and parliamentarian as a thoroughly decent individual as well as a fearless, forthright champion of mainstream conservative values and the positive role of Western civilisation.

Continue reading ‘A PUSHBACK AGAINST VISCERAL UNREASON’

The irrationality of transgenderism is a step too far

Marxist ideology has made a distinction between biological sex and gender. Biological sex, male and female, is fixed. It can’t be changed. Of course, one can apply surgical interventions, like removing penis and testicles, but in terms of biological sex that amounts to mutilation. A person of the male sex without a penis, is a man without a penis. A deficient man.

On the othe hand, gender is fluid – so Marxist transgenderists tell us. From one moment to the other, a person can fancy himself male or female – or any other of the multiple genders the ideologues have dreamed up. Gender is a social construct – totally unstable and totally anarchic. The new discourse about gender overrides the discourse of sex and sex differences that has prevailed since time out of mind.

That attitude to sex from time out of mind saw biology and social behaviour inextricably linked. When revered novelist Jane Austen has her characters talk about the ‘female sex’ they are talking about character and social behaviour that is inherently female – not about penises and vaginas. There is a beautiful passage at the end of Persuasion where the central character Anne Eliot talks about the different ways men and women grieve over loss.

But social differences are, as I say, a construct according to the Marxist transgenderists, a construct formed by bourgeois capitalist society. Such an assertion is just an assertion – and not even a plausible one considering the observable differences between men and women regarding physical, affective and psychological make-up.

The Marxist will offer an explanation (not a proof in the proper sense) that draws on the materialist dialectic, a wobbly largely incomprehensible theory even to many self-avowed Marxist. You see, the Marxist cannot appeal to the empirical evidence because inductive and deductive logic are illegitimate bourgeois forms of reasoning the dialectic rules out of court.

The sober non-Marxist will not eschew the normal forms of reasoning and in the case of the social behaviour of men and women will argue inductively, that is, draw on the empirical evidence of the centuries. Since time out of mind the totality of differences between men and women have remained regular. Just as we know the sun will rise in the east tomorrow because it has ever been observed to rise in the east, so will men and women exhibit the same essential differences they have always exhibited.

Transgenderism is a cruel hoax perpetrated on psychologically confused children and adults by ideologues. It is bad enough that adults are indulged in this cruel fantasy. It is criminal that children without appeal are forced onto a mutilating conveyor belt of chemical and surgical applications.

There is more, however, to the story than these faults of reasoning. The problem of unintended consequences has reared its inconvenient head. Two articles have  appeared that discuss some serious consequences. Bill Muehlenberg has posted a piece of his website, ‘Trans Sanity is Destroying Women (and Everything else). Janet Albrecht has an article in the Australian, ‘First cut is the deepest but reversal also traumatic for trans community.’ Both are recommended.

On ‘sh..hole countries’

 

On Mark Latham Outsiders Facebook page

Some facts about the world

The Trump controversy about “shithole countries” perfectly demonstrates how he has broken the PC-elitist hold on political debate.

Fact: some countries are shitholes, unfortunately.
Fact: effective immigration programs recruit highly-capable people from advanced, successful countries (just look at Melbourne’s Sudanese gang crime problem for the alternative approach).

Trump is simply being realistic about the situation. He’s also saying that immigration policies should be framed for the benefit of the people living in a country right now, not as some gift to the rest of the world.

Leftist elites are upset with Trump because they believe in a borderless world, where immigration is framed around owing the rest of the world something, instead of hard-headed national interests.

In truth, importing shithole people from shithole countries creates massive crime, welfare dependancy and dislocation problems for the nations that do it. That lesson is crystal clear from around the world.

The Left try to use PC as a way of shielding the public debate from these basic facts. It’s a cruel con-job on the folks without political power and access to decision-making.The Left live in nice leafy, gentrified suburbs where newly-arrived migrants from Third World countries can’t afford to live. Then these migrants are duck-shoved out to poorer suburbs, making them other people’s problems.

While the Left then virtue-signals about how “compassionate” they are. That’s how the loaded immigration debate works and, for too long, Australia has fallen for it.