A fact not listed below: Most Teals are women, which means in such a powerful position, they are man-hating feminists. This is the empirical evidence from women reaching executive positions. Specifically, it comes from their own mouths (outspoken about quotas) and from their targeting conservative seats, particularly those held by men.

As a man, you would have to be stupid to vote for a TEAL candidate – that is, vote against your own interests.

Since the last election, eight electorates have been represented by “Teal” independents, supported (including with donations) by the Climate 200 group, which the Australian Electoral Commissions defines as a “significant third party”.

The Teals’ record shows they:

• Vote most often with The Greens.
• Vote far more often with Labor than Liberals.
• Won’t say who they’d put into government if there’s a hung parliament.
• Are very unclear on economic policy.
• Advocate a range of higher taxes.
• Are weak on security.
• Only stand against Liberals and Nationals.
• Use campaign operatives with strong links to Labor and GetUp.
• Show a number of examples of hypocrisy.
• Are bankrolled by wealthy donors in Sydney and Melbourne.

Voting with the Greens and Labor

Parliament’s official Hansard shows that since the last election, eight Teal independents in the House of Representatives have:

• Voted most often with the Greens (average 73%).
• Voted more often with Labor (average 41%) than Liberal (average 33%).

Read the rest here . . .

The main concern of Edmund Burke’s political activity – as expressed in his speeches and writings – was the British Constitution – the idea of a constitution in the broad sense, not just a written document.

Now, in his defence of the British Constitution against revolution, it was claimed by his opponents that he was deplorably inconsistent. The argument went so:

1. He vigorously defended the Glorious Revolution of 1688-1689 – the deposing of Catholic James II and installing his Protestant daughter Mary and her Dutch Protestant husband William III on the British throne.

2. He was sympathetic to the American revolutionaries – see the American speeches, considered among his best.

2. He denounced the French Revolution as ‘methodising anarchy’ and waged a furious battle against those in the House who supported the French Revolutionaries.

Burke was dismissive in answering the charge of inconsistency. The revolution of 1688-1689 was ‘necessary’ in the highest moral sense because James II threatened to destroy the British Constitution. The same argument applies to the French Revolution. Such a revolution in Britain would have meant the decomposition of its political structure. He argued his position in detail in his masterpieces Reflections on the Revolution in France (1789) and An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs (1791).

His limited defence of the American revolutionaries was based on his claims that the British Government was denying the rights and liberties guaranteed to the British Americans in the British Constitution.

There was no inconsistency. One must see the Constitution in terms of a 360-degree circle with the Constitution in the middle. It can be attacked from all sides. Different means and different arguments are applied in each individual case.

What are the possible charges against President Donald Trump?

1. As the leader of the world’s most powerful democracy, he has colluded with the dictator of Russia, thus seriously threatening the rules-based order that has protected the world’s democracies for eighty years against their enemies.

2. He has no mandate to reconcile America with the savage Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. It is beyond his duties as president.

3. In colluding with dictator Vladimir Putin, the leader of the West’s traditional enemy, he has committed treason.

4. In sabotaging the mechanisms of Western defence, he has committed treason.

5. In depicting Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, as a dictator and the originator of the war in Ukraine, he has spread blatant falsehoods that encourage the Russian elite to advance their publicly announced imperial ambitions against the West.

6. In depicting Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, as a dictator and the originator of the war in Ukraine, he has promoted Russian propaganda for the dictator Vladimir Putin.

In conclusion, President Donald Trump has betrayed Americans, America, and the West to its enemies. He undermined the Constitution of the Western World. He is guilty of high treason.

As in the Glorious Revolution, necessity of the highest moral order demands Trump’s removal from the office of president.

As in the Glorious Revolution, the Constitution’s elected representatives are obligated to hold an extraordinary gathering in which the removal is legally declared and a trustworthy replacement from the Republican Party appointed.

As in the Glorious Revolution, the necessary force is to be employed to make effective the legal declaration.

How much more of the Australian nation’s land will Australia’s treasonous elites give away to culturally reinvented separatists?

Has there ever been a greater act of betrayal?

*****

Kabi Kabi people recognised as Native Title holders over the Sunshine Coast

ABC Sunshine Coast / By Kirra Grimes 17 June 2024

• In short: A Federal Court judge has recognised the Kabi Kabi people as native title holders over Queensland’s Sunshine Coast.
• The order applies to 365,345 hectares of land and waters spanning Gympie, Noosa, Maroochydore, Caloundra, Bribie Island and Mudjimba Island.
• What’s next? Other parts of the native title claim are yet to be determined.

The Federal Court has formally recognised the Kabi Kabi people as native title holders over 365,345 hectares of land and water on Queensland’s Sunshine Coast.

A determination by Justice Berna Collier at a special hearing in Brisbane on Monday recognised the Kabi Kabi people’s non-exclusive rights to an area including Gympie, Noosa, Maroochydore, Caloundra, Bribie Island and Mudjimba Island.

Justice Collier told the court she was satisfied the Kabi Kabi people “have and always have had native title rights and interests in this country”.

The determination marks the first occasion on Australia’s east coast when native title has been recognised in a heavily urbanised area.

It is also the first time that the right to “take resources from the area for any purpose” is being recognised in South-East Queensland.

Previously, the right was limited to personal, communal and non-commercial purposes.

The decision comes after seven Kabi Kabi applicants reached an agreement with stakeholders including the state and federal governments and seven local councils.

The court’s decision only applies to Part A of the Kabi Kabi people’s claim, which extends in the south from Elimbah Creek catchment area, Sandstone Point and Bribie Island, north to Cooloola National Park, Curra State Forest, Mary River and the Isis River, and in the east from lowest astronomical tide of the coastline west to Nambour, Jimna and the Burnett and Coast ranges.

Parts B and C of the claim are yet to be determined.

Read the rest here . . .

Many of us – not only conservatives – have been sickened to the pits of our stomach over the corporate world’s supine puppy-dog attitude to the commissars of the woke class. Many of those commissars are the newly appointed feminist CEOs of big corporations. The Coles and Woolworth’s CEOs are excellent examples of the feminist activists who have got a foothold in business through quotas and positive discrimination.

So, it has been a surprise that a male chairman of a high-profile corporation has stiffened his backbone and admitted the wooshes of big business have cringed in fear over what the woke class will do if they do not obey.

Well done, John Mullen. May you continue to keep your backbone straight.

***

Warren Mundine brands corporate Voice support a ‘national disgrace’ after new Qantas chair John Mullen admits companies got it wrong

Warren Mundine has welcomed an admission by incoming Qantas chair John Mullen that corporate support for the Voice to Parliament’s Yes campaign “backfired” on companies, arguing big businesses “looked down their noses” at anyone opposed to the proposal.

Max Melzer, SkyNews, 14 June 2024

Prominent Indigenous advocate Warren Mundine has branded corporate support for the Voice to Parliament a “national disgrace,” after incoming Qantas chair John Mullen conceded businesses did themselves a “disservice” by backing the proposal.

Qantas drew significant public criticism when it announced its backing for the controversial Indigenous body, with the airline beset by a number of scandals around the time campaigning for the Voice referendum began.

Other corporate bodies also joined the Yes campaign, sparking accusations of tokenism from some Voice opponents who argued business should remain independent of social issues.

Now, months after the Voice referendum was rejected, Qantas’ new chair has become one of the only business leaders to concede corporate Australia may have made a mistake in how it handled the campaign.

Speaking to The Australian on Thursday, Mr Mullen, who will take over the reins at the airline in July, admitted backing the Yes campaign “backfired” on big business by creating the impression it was acting “high and mighty.”

“The way that corporate Australia went about supporting it was detrimental to the image of corporate Australia in the eyes of many people,” he said.

“In retrospect, the broader business community was seen by a lot of people in Australia as high and mighty and telling us what we should do.”

Read the rest here . . .

I keep wondering why nobody will do anything. Why won’t someone in authority do something about the constant wrecking of Western Civilization and take up the sword to defend us against the saboteurs and traitors? Is there no one who will save us and our heritage?

As a kid learning to read, I read thousands of comics. Among my favourites were the superhero comics Superman, Batman and Robin, the Phantom and others. These heroes – images of real men – were courageous, unflinching in danger, protected the weak, and made a mess of the baddies. It was impossible for me to imagine such men kissing a man. My stomach would have heaved uncontrollably. I was no different from most boys who loved their superheroes.

DC Comics, the company that publishes the Superman comics, has betrayed their constituency. They have befouled the ideal and tradition behind those wonderful fictional characters and stories, stories that kept millions of boys quiet and dreaming.

One way to counter the betrayal is to boycott DC comics product. They will feel intense pain if they lose money to their far-left campaigns, campaigns to turn Western Society on its head.

*****

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it’s the first bisexual Superman

The Australian OCTOBER 12, 2021

Superman fell for a reporter and now his son is doing the same, although this time the superhero’s love interest is a man called Jay.

DC Comics announced on Monday that the new Superman, who is the son of Clark Kent and Lois Lane, will have a romantic relationship with a male friend.

Jon Kent and budding journalist Jay Nakamura struck up a friendship in a story released in August. They will share a kiss in a comic to be published next month, the publisher said, describing Kent as “bisexual.”

“Following a scene where Superman mentally and physically burns out from trying to save everyone that he can, Jay is there to care for the Man of Steel,” DC Comics said.

The storyline will feature in “Son of Kal-El” issue five, due to hit shelves on November 9, the publisher said in a press release headlined “Jon Kent finds his identity.”

Read the rest here…