It was not so many years ago in Mornington on the Mornington Peninsula that a huge, festive parade would process down Main Street to the bay to celebrate the foundation of the nation of Australia on the 26th of January 1788. There would be floats, some piled with excited kids, representing a variety of clubs, associations, and businesses. It was a thoroughly enjoyable family day.
But it was all too white for the people who gained control of the Mornington Peninsula Council. Too many white kiddies around. The parade had to go.
I will stroll down to the bay end of Main Street to see if there’s any vestige of that former celebration. I will then visit the council’s offices at Mornington, Somerville, Hastings, and Rosebud, where the councillors’ political propensities are on full display.
The TEAL candidate (a feminist, of course) for the seat of Bradfield, Nicolette Boele, is reported (see below) as saying to the nineteen-year-old female hairdresser who washed her hair, “That was amazing, and I didn’t even have sex with you.”
Now, last century, that is, before 2000, most people would have laughed at the witticism. I think it’s pretty witty. Having worked in the book industry, which is dominated by women, I have heard that sort of female witticism before.
But since 2000 everything has changed. And women like the extreme woke TEALs have changed it. The TEAL hypocrite, Nicolette Boele, is getting no more than she deserves.
The only other point to make is that if a male made the same remark to a nineteen-year-old female hairdresser, he would have been destroyed in short time, never ever to be considered for any position of note.
If any male votes for any of the TEALs, he is voting against himself and the full gamut of his interests.
*****
Teal banned from Sydney hairdresser for sex joke
A high-profile election candidate has issued an apology after remarks she made to a teen girl surfaced on morning radio.
Samantha Maiden, news.com.au, 1 April 2025
The independent candidate for the battleground seat of Bradfield has been banned from a local hairdresser for joking that getting her hair washed was better than sex.
The bizarre election campaign controversy has exploded in the leafy suburbs of the federal electorate located in Sydney’s north shore.
The seat is currently held by Liberal Paul Fletcher, who announced last year he would not be running for re-election in a field including high-profile independent Nicolette Boele (pronounced “Buller”).
Independent candidate for Bradfield Nicolette Boele. Picture: Twitter
However, 2GB radio’s Ben Fordham has revealed her campaign has now hit a snag over racy comments she made to a teenage hairdresser.
“Now, this is a bizarre one,” Fordham said.
“A candidate at the upcoming federal election has apologised for making a comment about sex in front of a teenager.
“And we’re told that she’s been banned from a local hairdresser as a result.”
Fordham said when he first read the email tipping him off about the issue: “We thought, ‘oh, this won’t be true’, but it turns out there’s some truth to it because she’s now apologised.
“The email says Nicolette Boele has been banned from her local hairdresser for sexual comments made to staff.
“They sent her a legal letter last week as the owner wants to protect the young, vulnerable staff.
“The comments were made after her hair was washed and they were directed at a 19-year-old girl.
“She allegedly said that was amazing and I didn’t even have sex with you.”
It’s not known if she was referring to a head massage or simply getting shampooed and conditioned.
But the comments by the middle-aged woman left the teenage hairdresser alarmed.
“The listener says, if that was a man saying that there would and should be an investigation, so why should a woman get away with this?”.
Fordham then revealed the person who tipped off the show found about the controversy because his own wife gets her hair cut at the salon.
The suggestion that California’s devastating fires might be a punishment for the collective degradation and depravity of that state – so manifest in its film and television industry – is so repugnant to the woke mind that it might be declared a crime.
Once upon a time, as fables used to begin, Australians could rely on established Australian companies and the corporate world in general to defend Australia and its history. Not any more. The corporate world is showing its lost its backbone. It’s now filled with weak men and wokist women. The companies and individuals below have chosen to destroy the Australia nation, as it originated in Sydney Cove, erase its history, and replace it with a reinvented Aboriginal culture with its accompanying myths. An Aboriginal Frankenstein.
These culturally empty people stink of self-loathing.
P & O Australia The cruise ship operator sent an internal memo to staff last week prohibiting the use of the flag or playing of the national anthem as well as banning any Australia Day paraphernalia. They said they wanted to ‘include’ everyone. What nonsense. They were too gutless to go against the woke activists. P&O Cruises overturn Australia Day ban following community backlash | Sky News Australia
Telstra – CEO Vicki Brady The Coalition has accused Labor of encouraging corporate Australia “to change our national day by stealth” after Telstra chief executive Vicki Brady revealed she would work on Thursday, declaring that for many First Nations people January 26 was a “painful reminder of discrimination and exclusion”.
Ms Brady is, to date, the highest profile corporate figure who has chosen to publicly announce they will be working on Thursday, as the national debate continues about the appropriateness of celebrating the day when Sir Arthur Phillip arrived in Sydney Cove in 1788. (The Australian, 25 January)
Canva
Lawyers Herbert Smith Freehills and Gilbert + Tobin
Richard Harrison & Frank Salter, Quadrant, 28 April 2022
Part 1 of this series examined antipathy towards Anglos, who were defined as: people descended from the indigenous population of the British Isles in Australia and overseas as well as those who have assimilated into those populations.
We named this hatred “Anglophobia” in line with other forms of hostility such as homophobia and Islamophobia. As Anglophobia is a form of racism, various dimensions of racism were discussed along with related sociological concepts. Types of Anglophobia were described under the headings vilification, discrimination and violence.
In Part 2 we continue examining types of vilification, especially Critical Race Theory. This ideology has expanded to become an industry, impinging negatively on popular culture, education and much more. Connected topics include the claim that only white people can be racist because racism is a form of power, the replacement of Anglo identity in historical movies, and the firing of a producer of the British television drama Midsomer Murders. Finally, we examine how the accusation of “white supremacism” levelled at Anglo culture is contradicted by that culture not having the highest incomes or educational outcomes.
[4. Are considered prone to racism according to the ideology of “Critical Race Theory”, even when no direct evidence of racism exists.]
One of the most astonishing movements in recent years, backed by theory and the academy, is the steep rise of anti-white racism. Anti-white racism, typically called ‘anti-racism’ by its purveyor, entered the campuses with Marxism in the 1960s, but it has skyrocketed in the last twenty years. It should be no surprise because Marxism and Marxist ideas infect all organs of our disintegrating Western Society.
It’s wrapped in the usual twisted, swollen, obfuscating academic jargon, but its bottom line is a fierce hatred for white people and their civilization, most specifically people from and Anglo background, meaning those from the British Isles or those with ancestry in the British Isles. The worst of its utterances is the call for white genocide. How could this be? Why has there been no effective action to stop its spread?
Australia ended its so-called ‘white Australia’ policy in 1973. (Keith Windschuttle has vigorously challenged the ‘White Australia’ thesis in his book, The White Australia Policy.) Since then the nation has bent over backwards to alter its perception as a racist country. Our immigration policy has been scrupulously non-discriminatory. We have taken people from the poorest, most underdeveloped countries, even those from strikingly incompatible cultures, and given them a chance of a new life for their families. While most immigrants express their gratitude for a new start, there is a growing minority subscribing to the ‘whiteness’ propaganda.
Some of the most outspoken purveyors of Anglophobia or anti-white racism come from countries wracked by poverty and ethnic violence. After receiving an education that has given them a university qualification and the way into the best jobs and political networks they rage about the ‘whiteness’ that surrounds them (see case of Xiaoran Shi). They are blind to the fact that white people were responsible for all the advantages they enjoy.
Until the 1950s, after most of our social and economic infrastructure had been established, at least ninety-five percent of Australians were from an Anglo background. Should a determined campaign of racial hatred reward us for the struggle, sometimes soul-destroying, to build one of the most prosperous and politically free nations in the world? Below are links to articles and commentaries on Anglophobia.
The articles below are the first major analyses of Anglophobia in Australia. At this time, the articles (Pts 1 & 2) are available to subscribers only.
‘Australia has three stories: Indigenous foundations; British institutions; and multicultural migration. On Friday, he told an assembly of Indigenous and non-Indigenous students – including migrants – that the referendum Australia was heading towards was a chance to reconcile them all.’
But Pearson is wrong on both accounts. A division along racial lines won’t unite anyone. I will defend that claim at another time. Here I am concerned with what he calls ‘three stories’, but more accurately are three divisions or classes of Australian society, the indigenous class implicitly the superior class. It is the alleged foundations that he gets pitifully wrong.
The idea of a nation is not that of a mass of land. A nation is a coherence of traditions, customs, law, manners, and a system of justice, developed over time. Edmund Burke called it a ‘moral incorporation’ . The physical environment of the moral incorporation influences a nation’s growth in a secondary sense.
When Captain Arthur Phillip drove the British flag into the earth of Sydney Cove on 26 January 1788 and later read the public commission to the assembly of First Fleeters on 7 February, he signalled the foundation of a new nation with its cultural and political lines going back to the British Isles. This was the foundation of the nation which officially became known as Australia several decades later.
The many local tribes had absolutely no input into Australia’s foundations, let alone those dispersed around the vast continent. Some of these would not see a European until decades later. As I wrote in my book Prison Hulk to Redemption:
‘It is misleading and false to talk about the Aboriginals before European settlement as “Australians.” Indeed, the word “Aboriginal” is a post-settlement term to refer to a group of several hundred distinct tribes with different languages … This is the hard reality, whether one likes it or not. It would make more sense to adopt a collective noun like “Aboriginalia” to refer to the collection of tribes before settlement. After settlement, everything changed—in the same manner it had done throughout history when peoples were on the move. The peoples of Aboriginalia would, in time, become integral members of the new nation Australia and make their own unique contribution. Aboriginalia would drift into the mists of history.’
All the present talk about First Nations, land rights, justice, civil rights and so on, presupposes the nation of Australia as I have described it.
Nobody could miss the campaign all over television to promote inter-race relationships. The purpose seems clear enough. The (mostly white) woke mob who control all organs of information dissemination want to dissolve the white population – breed us out of existence. Enough of white supremacy – particularly in white societies like Australia!
In order to succeed in this tactic, the wokists think they have to get the population used to the idea of mixed-race couples with their mix-race children. They must desensitize people’s negative reactions. The most frequent inter-race couple portrayed is a black man and a (lily) white woman.
If you vote for the Labor Party or the lunatic Greens you’ll be voting for a policy of separatism, the formal establishment of a superior class, cultural reinvention, myth-making, the surrender of vast tracts of land, wholesale changing of names, and the rewriting of Australian history.
