Tag Archives: Aboriginal fakes

Qantas Management – fantasising political wokists

Robert Hill, in the article below, shows how much falsehood, fakery, distortion, and political crawling have seized the minds of Qantas’s management. Note that Qantas has a female CEO, Vanessa Hudson. Females at this executive level are always feminist activists who see their primary duty as using their position to advance the wokist agenda. Hudson plays the role with great flair.

******

Flying Woora Nungina into Naarm

Robert Hill, QUADRANT, July 2025

Warning: This article contains elements of satire, a word meaning a form of expression that uses wit, irony, sarcasm, and parody to expose hypocrisy or absurdity in individuals, institutions, or cultural trends.

If this article offends you, consider broadening your education, ideally with a dictionary and a history book.  This is not racism. It is ridicule, directed not at race, but at the modern cult of performative virtue, bureaucratised identity, and corporate theatre. If you can’t tell the difference, that’s precisely the problem.

I was at the main entrance of the Qantas lounge in Sydney when the very first thing I saw, front and centre, impossible to miss was the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) map, proudly displayed for all travellers to behold. Across it, in bold type, were the words: “Know where you’re going.” I thought: Melbourne.  That’s what my ticket said.

I looked at the map and discovered I was going to Woiwurrung.

Something felt off. With time to burn, I started to dig. I wish I hadn’t. Like everything dressed in the costume of Aboriginal culture, something so simple as the AIATSIS map quickly became a rabbit hole, one that leads not to knowledge, but to propaganda: plagiarised from white men, sold as black truth, and protected by a system that punishes anyone who dares name the fraud.

Please come down the rabbit hole with me.

I was going to Woiwurrung — or so the Qantas signage told me — a name now plastered across Welcome to Country scripts, corporate acknowledgements, and airport lounges. But Woiwurrung was never a nation, never a sovereign people, and never a name known to those it now supposedly honours. It is a linguistic label, stitched together by anthropologists who noted that one group used woi for “no” and wurrung for “mouth” or “speech.” From this slender etymology has grown a sprawling political fiction, one that now lays moral claim to cities, infrastructure, and the national conscience.

As an English speaker, in a land where English is the official language, I translated what I was being told: I wasn’t flying to Melbourne, I was flying to “no mouth” or “no speech.” Somehow, this cryptic fragment of dialectal trivia has been rebranded as a proud and ancient nation, complete with borders, elders, and ceremonies carefully refurbished for modern consumption.

But the truth is far less poetic. Woiwurrung was a loose patchwork of clans, not a people united under one law or one name. There was no central authority, no enduring legal code, no shared flag, only scattered groups defending their ground in a world of shifting alliances and inter-tribal violence. The unity now claimed is a modern invention, projected backwards to serve political ends.

To suggest that Woiwurrung encompasses Melbourne, or that its “nation” has endured in unbroken lineage, is not history. It is myth, repackaged as moral leverage and it deserves to be called what it is: fiction masquerading as fact.

Read the rest here . . .

Lying undemocratic Marxist monsters – one and all

Second state set for own Indigenous voice to parliament

Story by Callum Godde, AAP, 1 July 2025

A permanent Indigenous voice to parliament is on its way for another Australian state but won’t be written into its constitution as a treaty deal nears.

Victoria is set to follow South Australia in establishing a state-based, democratically elected body to provide advice on laws and policies related to Aboriginal people.

The creation of the ongoing body has been on the table since January as part of treaty talks between the state government and First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria.

 Premier Jacinta Allan indicated it was likely to be agreed to and, unlike the failed federal voice, would not require constitutional change.

“The key difference to the referendum that was put nationwide a couple of years ago is that was changing the constitution,” she told reporters on Monday.

“This is not changing the Victorian constitution.”

Victoria recorded the highest ‘yes’ vote of any state at 45.85 per cent in the 2023 referendum.

The ACT (61.3 per cent) was the only state or territory to back the proposal.

SA is the only jurisdiction to legislate a state-based, democratically elected body for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

The SA Voice is made up of 46 Aboriginal members elected across six regional districts.

A statewide Victorian treaty is expected to be struck later in 2025, with enabling legislation to then go before parliament.

The Victorian opposition withdrew its support for treaty in January 2024 following the failed referendum, citing concerns about cultural heritage laws.

It means the Labor government will need the support of as many as six upper-house crossbench MPs for the treaty agreement.

Aboriginal people are best placed to offer expert advice on their own lives, Rueben Berg says.

Mr Berg said the talks also covered the assembly playing an ongoing role in truth-telling, keeping government accountable and developing leadership capability for its people.

Read the rest here . . .

Yoorook farce

The truth about Victorian colonisation

The country was strewn with bones, and we were always at war

Luke Powell, Spectator, 7 July 2025

The over 100 recommendations to the Victorian government, including Aboriginal reparations, natural resource revenue, and selling off public land, made by the Yoorrook Commission’s latest report Truth Be Told, rests entirely on one historical claim:

‘The scars of colonial invasion – its massacres, violence, and relentless erasure – are not confined to the past. They reside in the present, shaping the lives of First Peoples in Victoria today.’

It took four years and $44 million to write the report, and in a public statement the Premier of Victoria has not ruled out any recommendations.

The authors of the report claim that the single most influential and damaging historical event was the massacring of Aboriginal people.

Put simply, the gap in education, health, income, housing, domestic violence, substance abuse, homicides, suicides, and a whole plethora of issues, is implied to exist because of European violence perpetrated around 200 years ago.

Let me be clear, Aboriginal people were the victims of massacres.

But the report oversimplifies European colonisation, over-exaggerates the death toll, and overlooks the other causes of Aboriginal population decline.

Read the rest here. . .

A useful distinction between ‘pre-colonial foragers’ and ‘contemporary Aboriginal Australians’ – they are not the same

From Quillette:

Australia is one of the only places where humans maintained a hunter-gatherer lifestyle into the modern era. This makes it an invaluable window into humanity’s deep past—a window that is closing, writes Mungo Manic. This video explores the complexities surrounding the identity and history of Aboriginal Australians, particularly focusing on the distinction between contemporary Aboriginal Australians and the pre-colonial foragers. It delves into the impact of colonization on these communities, the ambiguity of Aboriginal identity, and the challenges faced in preserving the archaeological and cultural heritage of Australia’s forager past.

White reinvented Aboriginals preside over ‘truth-telling’ farce

Below is a 3 September report from the ‘Yoorrook Justice Commission’. This justice commission is about slandering the white settlers who built the nation that funds such commissions whose sole object is to disqualify the true Australians – the people who originated from the community of the First Fleet. The Aboriginals – a post-settlement determination – had nothing to do with the nation’s establishment. In fact, they did their best to stop the nation building by slaughtering settlers, killing their stock, and burning their crops.

How’s that for truth?

You won’t get that truth – empirically justified – from the ‘Yoorrook Commission’. You’ll get their own brand of self-serving separatist truth.

*****

Descendants of early colonial figures to give evidence to Yoorrook

September 3, 2024

Content warning: Please note the following contains historic language and events that may cause distress to First Peoples.

Three non-Indigenous witnesses are set to give evidence to Victoria’s truth telling process this week. This includes two descendants of early colonial figures who will reflect on their families’ involvement in key events in Victoria’s colonial history, which had a devastating effect on First Peoples.

The hearing will look at issues including early massacres of First Peoples in the 1830s and 40s and the passing of the so-called ‘Half Caste’ Act in 1886, which played a key role in the Stolen Generations.

The Yoorrook Justice Commission hearing will commence at 10am on Wednesday September 4 and will be livestreamed via the Yoorrook Facebook page and website.

Witnesses will include:

  • Elizabeth Balderstone, the current owner of a property in Gippsland on which the ‘Warrigal Creek’ massacre occurred in 1843.
  • Peter Sharp, a great grandson of former Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, who has researched Deakin’s involvement in the passage of the Aborigines Protection Act 1886, more commonly known as the ‘Half Caste’ Act.
  • Dr Katrina Kell, a researcher, author and fourth-generation matrilineal descendant of Captain James Liddell, who brought Edward Henty to Gunditjmara Country in November 1834 on board ‘the Thistle’, leading to the first permanent European settlement in what would become the State of Victoria.

Read the rest here . . .

Indoctrination and national betrayal – how far will it go?

Students told to put ‘hands on the ground’, repeat ‘always will be Aboriginal land’ before assembly

Primary students are being told to put their “hands on the ground” and say “always will be Aboriginal land” during the Acknowledgement of Country.

Frank Chung, news.com.au 2 July 2024

Students at a Sydney primary school are being told to put their hands on the ground and repeat “always was, always will be Aboriginal land” as part of the Acknowledgement of Country ceremony before each assembly.

It’s understood schools are also increasingly opting to play the “Aboriginal instruments” Australian national anthem in lieu of the standard version for assemblies.

“I’m not sure a lot of people know,” said one mum from NSW’s lower Blue Mountains, who did not want her children’s school named. “We have to touch the ground and say ‘always was, always will be Aboriginal land’ at the start of assembly at school now.”

The mum said she “only noticed recently” the addition of the updated national anthem accompanied by the didgeridoo and stick instruments.

Versions of the national anthem featuring Aboriginal instruments have been in use at some schools for several years, and are listed among official recordings on the Prime Minister and Cabinet website.

“A lot of the parents look confused when they place their hands on the floor for the Acknowledgement of Country,” the mum added.

Another parent at the school confirmed touching the ground had been a standard part of assemblies for some time.

It’s understood that the NSW Department of Education advocates the use of the Acknowledgement of Country at schools across the state as a sign of respect to local Indigenous communities.

Read the rest here . . .

Fakes reinventing themselves as Aboriginal

On the Andrew Bolt Show, Sky News:

‘He’s a fake’: Details emerge of late Indigenous scholar’s heritage

Dark Emu Exposed’s Roger Karge reveals the details he has uncovered about the heritage of the late Indigenous academic Professor Eric Willmot. Professor Willmot is known for his involvement in Indigenous education in Australia.

“We got an email out of the blue from Eric Willmot’s sisters,” Mr Karge told Sky News host Andrew Bolt. “They said look, they’ve been trying to seek justice for 40 odd years, that you know they’re very pro Aboriginal … but said the family is horrified because they know they’re not Aboriginal. “So the family gave me some information, I got our genealogists to work on it, and he’s got quite a simple family tree but all their ancestors come from England, Scotland, Ireland and one from Germany – there’s no Aboriginality at all. “He’s a fake basically.”